|
Local -
Politics
|
|
Written by MCC news
|
|
Friday, 05 February 2010 18:11 |
|
Due to bar association and other legal entanglements by Ms. Olivo's challenger, Ron Reynolds, in the TX district 27 state house race and her long dedication to education issues locally, FBISDWatch is formerly endorsing Dora Olivo in her bid for re-election. Get more from her campaign website on her service history and supporters at:http://www.doraolivo.com/
http://fbisdwatch.blogspot.com/2010/01/fbisdwatch-endorses-dora-olivio-for.html
http://missouricitychatter.blogspot.com/2010/01/fbisdwatch-endorses-dora-olivio-for.html
Background on this race and rationale for endorsement:
http://www.ethics.state.tx.us/dfs/COH_delinquent.htm (Reynold's on the Ethics Commission Delinquent List, $10,500)
Trackback(0)
 |
On Nov. 22, 2005, Ronald E. Reynolds, 31, of Houston, accepted a six-month, partially probated suspension effective March 31, 2006, upon completion of his current active suspension, with the first three months actively served and the remainder probated. An evidentiary panel of the District 4-D Grievance Committee found that Reynolds was retained to represent his client in a personal injury case. In January 2004, Reynolds settled the case without his client’s knowledge or consent. Reynolds then received settlement proceeds from the insurer without notifying his client, negotiated the settlement check without distributing the funds to his client, and misrepresented to his client that he was still working on the case after he had successfully negotiated the settlement check. Reynolds violated Rules 1.01(b)(2), 1.03(a) and (b), 1.14(a) and (b), and 8.04(a)(3). He agreed to pay $350 in attorney’s fees.
In another instance, Reynolds neglected matters for three clients:
On Feb. 9, Ronald E. Reynolds [#24025610], 31, of Katy accepted a four-year, partially probated suspension effective April 1, 2005, with the first 364 days actively served and the remainder probated. An evidentiary panel of the District 4-F Grievance Committee found Reynolds was retained in three separate matters and neglected each legal matter entrusted to him. He failed to carry out completely the obligations owed his clients, keep them reasonably informed about the status of their cases, or promptly comply with their reasonable requests for information. Reynolds violated Rules 1.01(b)(1)
and (b)(2) and 1.03(a). He was ordered to pay $3,000 in attorney’s fees.
As you can see, the Olivo/Reynolds battle will be a bloody one. Reynolds clearly has some baggage.